Preview

Medical Visualization

Advanced search

Diabetic fetopathy – pathogenesis, prognosis, perinatal and neonatal outcomes

https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1565

Abstract

Abstract. Diabetes mellitus (DM) during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of complications for both the mother and the fetus, and may also have adverse long-term consequences for the newborn. The incidence of DM among pregnant women is steadily increasing, which emphasizes the relevance of this problem. Despite progress in diagnostic methods and glucose control in pregnant women with DM, complications during pregnancy remain common, occurring in 80% of women with this disease.

Objective: to study the clinical, laboratory and ultrasound features of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus to determine the risk factors for the development of this pregnancy complication.

Materials and methods. The study included 86 patients and their newborns, who were divided into two groups according to pregnancy outcomes. Group I (main) – 43 women whose pregnancy was complicated by the development of diabetic fetopathy, Group II (control) – 43 patients whose pregnancy ended with the birth of a live full-term baby without signs of diabetic fetopathy.

Results. The following features were identified in the group of women with gestational diabetes mellitus: obesity (53% vs 11%), chronic arterial hypertension (11% vs 2%), thyroid disease (13% vs 4%) (p < 0.05). The presence of obesity increases the chance of developing gestational diabetes mellitus by 8.7 times (OR = 8.7; 95% CI: 2.885–26.478; p = 0.001). Laboratory parameters demonstrated an increase in cholesterol levels (p = 0.04), while no differences in glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels were found between the groups. Ultrasound parameters of the fetus revealed significant differences between the groups: abdominal circumference exceeded the 75th percentile (p = 0.001), double contour of the head was observed (p = 0.044), subcutaneous fat thickness of the neck exceeded 0.32 cm (p = 0.014), and subcutaneous fat thickness of the chest and abdomen exceeded 0.5 cm (p = 0.007). In the control group, with a fetal weight of more than 3000 g, the subcutaneous fat thickness of the neck was more than 0,3 cm, while in the main group it was 0,35 cm, which indicates the need to revise the threshold values in order to increase the prognostic value of the current sign. Statistically significant differences in uteroplacental and fetal-placental blood flow between the groups were not found. Anthropometric parameters of newborns, such as height and weight, also did not show significant differences between the groups. In the main group, periventricular edema was more often recorded (p = 0.02), and laboratory parameters in newborns indicated a significant increase in the frequency of hypoglycemia (p = 0.0002).

Conclusion. The study revealed significant features in women with gestational diabetes mellitus, including an increased risk of comorbidities such as obesity and chronic arterial hypertension, which emphasizes the importance of careful monitoring of the health of pregnant women and regular ultrasound examinations to assess the condition of the fetus. Ultrasound parameters showed changes that require further study and possible revision of existing standards. In addition, due to the lack of significant differences in glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels, it is necessary to analyze glucose variability using a continuous monitoring system, which will provide more accurate glycemic control in patients and have a positive effect on their health. Key words: ultrasound diagnostics, diabetic fetopathy, metabolic disorders, obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy risks, perinatal outcomes, maternal diseases.

About the Authors

N. D. Zimina
Siberian State Medical University; I.D. Yevtushenko Regional Perinatal Center
Russian Federation

Natalia D. Zimina – Assistant, Multidisciplinary Accreditation and Simulation Center, Siberian State Medical University; ultrasound diagnostics doctor, I.D. Yevtushenko Regional Perinatal Center, Tomsk
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9576-666X
E-mail: falloutgerl@mail.ru



S. V. Fomina
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Fomina – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, Head of the Department – Doctor of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-3393
E-mail: statfom@mail.ru



E. V. Mitselya
Siberian State Medical University; I.D. Yevtushenko Regional Perinatal Center
Russian Federation

Elena V. Mitselya – postgraduate student of the Department of Pediatrics with a course in endocrinology, Siberian State Medical University;  endocrinologist, I.D. Yevtushenko Regional Perinatal Center, Tomsk
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1429-3604
E-mail: voelva@mail.ru



Iu. G. Samoilova
Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation

Iulia G. Samoilova – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Head of the Department of Pediatrics with a Course in Endocrinology, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-4842
E-mail: samoilova_y@inbox.ru



References

1. Riddle M.C., Cefalu W.T., Evans P.H. et al. Consensus Report: Definition and Interpretation of Remission in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44 (10): 2438–2444. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci21-0034

2. Dedov I.I., Shestakova M.V., Mayorov A.Yu. et al. Algorithms for specialized medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Mellitus. 2021; 1S: 1–236. (In Russian)

3. Lebedeva M.A. Features of pregnancy management and childbirth in diabetic fetopathy: dis. ... candidate of medical sciences. Moscow: A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry. 2021. 120 p. (In Russian)

4. American Diabetes Association. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44 (Suppl. 1): S200–S210. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S014

5. Herath M.P., Beckett J.M., Hills A.P. et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and infant adiposity at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic interventions. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10 (4): 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040835

6. Riskin A., Garcia J. Infants of women with diabetes. UptoDate. Literature review current through: Aug. 2022. URL: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/infants-of-women-with-diabetes

7. Remneva O.V., Rozhkova O.V., Trukhacheva N.V., Brusentsov I.G. Prediction of diabetic fetopathy in gestational diabetes mellitus in the mother. Doctor.Ru. 2020; 19 (6): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2020-19-6-45-49 (In Russian)

8. Mishchenko O.I., Kryukov P.M., Moses K.B. et al. Diabetic fetopathy: pathogenesis, prognosis, perinatal and neonatal outcomes. Mother and Child in Kuzbass. 2020; 1 (80): 4–8. https://doi.org/10.24411/2686­7338­2020­10002 (In Russian)

9. Radzinsky V.E., Kotaysh G.A., Botasheva T.L., Volkova N.I. Obesity. Diabetes. Pregnancy. Versions and controversies. Clinical practices. Prospects. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2020. 528 p. (In Russian)

10. Moll U., Olsson H., Landin-Olsson M. Women with a predisposition for diabetes have an increased risk of pregnancy complications, especially in combination with pregestational overweight. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20 (1): 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2741-5

11. Lewandowska M. Maternal obesity and risk of low birth weight, fetal growth restriction, and macrosomia: multiple analyses. Nutrients. 2021; 13 (4): 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041213

12. Claire B., Sharon H. Should HbA1C be used to screen pregnant women for undiagnosed diabetes in the first trimester? A review of the evidence. J. Public Health. 2020; 42 (1): 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy229

13. Bozkurt L., Göbl C.S., Leitner K. et al. HbA1c during early pregnancy reflects beta-cell dysfunction in women developing GDM. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care. 2020; 8 (2): e001751. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001751

14. Walker A.R., Caughey A.B. Positivity thresholds of HbA1c assay as a screening test for diabetes mellitus in the first trimester in high-risk populations. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal. Med. 2022; 35 (2): 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1716213

15. Scott E.M., Feig D.S., Murphy H.R., Law G.R. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnancy: importance of analyzing temporal profiles to understand clinical outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43 (6): 1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-2527

16. Rozhkova O.V., Brusentsov I.G. Possibilities of ultrasound diagnostics of diabetic fetopathy in gestational diabetes mellitus. Mother and Child in Kuzbass. 2020; 1 (80): 32–36. https://doi.org/10.24411/2686-7338-2020-10006 (In Russian)

17. Stanirowski P.J., Majewska A., Lipa M. et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the fetal fat tissue, heart, liver and umbilical cord measurements in pregnancies complicated by gestational and type 1 diabetes mellitus: potential application in the fetal birth-weight estimation and prediction of the fetal macrosomia. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2021; 13 (1): 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-021-00634-7

18. Di Filippo D., Wanniarachchi T., Wei D. et al. The diagnostic indicators of gestational diabetes mellitus from second trimester to birth: a systematic review. Clin. Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021; 7 (1): 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-021-00126-7

19. Li M., Hinkle S.N., Grantz K.L. et al. Glycaemic status during pregnancy and longitudinal measures of fetal growth in a multi-racial US population: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020; 8 (4): 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30024-3

20. Adamczak L., Boron D., Gutaj P. et al. Fetal growth trajectory in type 1 pregestational diabetes (PGDM): an ultrasound study. Ginekol. Pol. 2021; 92 (2): 110–117. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2020.0136

21. Arakelyan G.A., Orazmuradov A.A., Mayatskaya T.A. et al. Features of newborns from mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus and pregestational obesity. Obstetrics and Gynecology: news, opinions, training. 2020; 8 (3): App. 24–29. https://doi.org/10.24411/2303-9698-2020-13904 (In Russian)

22. Antsiferova E.V., Taranushenko T.E., Kiseleva N.G. et al. Neonatal hypoglycemia in children with risk factors. Pacific Medical Journal. 2021; 4: 80–84. https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2021-4-80-84 (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Zimina N.D., Fomina S.V., Mitselya E.V., Samoilova I.G. Diabetic fetopathy – pathogenesis, prognosis, perinatal and neonatal outcomes. Medical Visualization. 2026;30(1):81-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1565

Views: 575

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-0763 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9516 (Online)