Fibrous cap state in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: Ultrasound diagnostic capabilities and implication for ischemic stroke risk stratification

Objective. To systematize the ultrasound features of various fibrous cap (FC) states of carotid atherosclerotic plaques that determine the risk of ischemic stroke, based on an analysis of the morphological changes in its surface that occur during plaque destabilization.

Content. This manuscript summarizes data both from literature and the authors' own experience. The FC separates the lipid-necrotic plaque core from the vessel lumen and is the most vulnerable to damage structure. Its thinning, rupture, and ulceration reflect different states of plaque destabilization and underlie the new Carotid Plaque-RADS stroke risk classification. The morphological features of each state are described, the threshold values for FC thickness are discussed. Ultrasound criteria for thick and thin plaque caps, plaque rupture, and healed ulceration are presented.

Conclusion. In routine practice, FC thickness on ultrasound is assessed qualitatively using the “seen/not seen” basis without quantitative measurement. Ultrasound detects cap ruptures with high accuracy and ulcerations with moderate accuracy. Contrast enhancement, three-dimensional reconstruction, and low-velocity blood flow mapping could improve diagnostic accuracy. Assessing the plaque’s FC status together with plaque structure and degree of stenosis is advisable for improving risk stratification and personalizing patient treatment.

1. Feigin V.L., Brainin M., Norrving B. et al. World Stroke Organization: Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2025. Int. J. Stroke. 2025; 20 (2): 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241308142

2. Ornello R., Degan D., Tiseo C. et al. Distribution and Temporal Trends From 1993 to 2015 of Ischemic Stroke Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2018; 49 (4): 814–819. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020031

3. Ospel J.M., Marko M., Singh N. et al. Prevalence of Non-Stenotic (<50%) Carotid Plaques in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020; 29 (10): 105117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105117

4. Zhang L., Guo Y., Zhou W. et al. Characteristics of non-stenotic carotid plaque in embolic stroke of undetermined source compared with cardiogenic embolism: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. BMC Neurol. 2022; 22 (1): 315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02846-4

5. Naghavi M., Libby P., Falk E. et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. Circulation. 2003; 108 (15): 1772–1778. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000087481.55887.C9

6. Shah P.K. Mechanisms of plaque vulnerability and rupture. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003; 41 (4 Suppl S): 15S–22S. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02834-6

7. Saba L., Cau R., Murgia A. et al. Carotid plaque-RADS: a novel stroke risk classification system. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging. 2024; 17 (1): 62–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.09.005

8. Ragino Yu.I., Volkov A.M., Chernyavskyi A.M. Stages of atherosclerotic plaque development and unstable plaque types: pathophysiologic and histologic characteristics. Russ J Cardiol. 2013; 5 (103): 88–95. (In Russian)

9. Alonso-Herranz L., Albarrán-Juárez J., Bentzon J.F. Mechanisms of fibrous cap formation in atherosclerosis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10: 1254114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1254114

10. Virmani R., Burke A.P., Farb A., Kolodgie F.D. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47 (8 Suppl.): C13–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065

11. Virmani R., Ladich E.R., Burke A.P., Kolodgie F.D. Histopathology of carotid atherosclerotic disease. Neurosurgery. 2006; 59 (5Suppl3): S; discussion S3–13. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000239895.00373.E4

12. Redgrave J.N., Gallagher P., Lovett J.K., Rothwell P.M. Critical cap thickness and rupture in symptomatic carotid plaques: the oxford plaque study. Stroke. 2008; 39 (6): 1722–1729. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.507988

13. Watanabe A., Saito K., Iihara K. et al. Ultrasonographic And Pathological Measurement Of Fibrous Cap In Rupture-prone Carotid Plaques Using Advanced Ultrasound Technology. Stroke. 2012; 43 (Suppl_1): A2286. https://doi.org/10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.A2286

14. Shindo S., Fujii K., Shirakawa M. et al. Morphologic features of carotid plaque rupture assessed by optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015; 36 (11): 2140–2146. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4404

15. Saba L., Anzidei M., Marincola B.C. et al. Imaging of the carotid artery vulnerable plaque. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2014; 37 (3): 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0711-2

16. Pakizer D., Taffé P., Kozel J. et al. Non-invasive imaging of individual histological carotid plaque characteristics: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2025: 120391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.120391

17. van der Wal A.C., Becker A.E., van der Loos C.M., Das P.K. Site of intimal rupture or erosion of thrombosed coronary atherosclerotic plaques is characterized by an inflammatory process irrespective of the dominant plaque morphology. Circulation. 1994; 89 (1): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.1.36

18. Kolodgie F.D., Burke A.P., Farb A. et al. The thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque: the major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2001; 16 (5): 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001573-200109000-00006

19. Bentzon J.F., Otsuka F., Virmani R., Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ. Res. 2014; 114 (12): 1852–1866. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721

20. Balakhonova T.V., Timina I.E., Chechetkin A.O., Shulgina L.E. Ultrasound aspects of the application of Carotid Plaque-RADS, a risk stratifi cation system for acute ischemic cerebral events. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. Journal named after Academician A.V. Pokrovsky. 2025; 31 (4): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.33029/1027-6661-2025-31-4-22-32 (In Russian)

21. Bentzon J.F., Sondergaard C.S., Kassem M., Falk E. Smooth muscle cells healing atherosclerotic plaque disruptions are of local, not blood, origin in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Circulation. 2007; 116 (18): 2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.722355

22. Teng Z., Degnan A.J., Sadat U. et al. Characterization of healing following atherosclerotic carotid plaque rupture in acutely symptomatic patients: an exploratory study using in vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2011; 13 (1): 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-64

23. Saba L., Caddeo G., Sanfilippo R. et al. CT and ultrasound in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with surgical results: potentialities and advantages of multidetector row CT angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007; 28 (6): 1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0486

24. Brinjikji W., Rabinstein A.A., Lanzino G. et al. Ultrasound Characteristics of Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2015; 40 (3–4): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437339

25. Eyding J., Geier B., Staub D. Current strategies and possible perspectives of ultrasonic risk stratification of ischemic stroke in internal carotid artery disease. Ultraschall. Med. 2011; 32 (3): 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1245924

26. ten Kate G.L., van Dijk A.C., van den Oord S.C. et al. Usefulness of contrastenhanced ultrasound for detection of carotid plaque ulceration in patients with symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 2013; 112 (2): 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.028

27. Kern R., Szabo K., Hennerici M., Meairs S. Characterization of carotid artery plaques using real-time compound B-mode ultrasound. Stroke. 2004; 35 (4): 870–875. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000120728.72958.4A

28. Rafailidis V., Chryssogonidis I., Tegos T. et al. Imaging of the ulcerated carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a review of the literature. Insights. Imaging. 2017; 8 (2): 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0543-8

29. de Bray J.M., Baud J.M., Dauzat M. Consensus concerning the morphology and the risk of carotid plaques. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 1997; 7: 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1159/000108415

30. Kuk M., Wannarong T., Beletsky V. et al. Volume of carotid artery ulceration as a predictor of cardiovascular events. Stroke. 2014; 45 (5): 1437–1441. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005163

31. Fisher M., Paganini-Hill A., Martin A. et al. Carotid plaque pathology: thrombosis, ulceration, and stroke pathogenesis. Stroke. 2005; 36 (2): 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000152336.71224.21

32. Sitzer M., Müller W., Rademacher J. et al. Color-flow Doppler-assisted duplex imaging fails to detect ulceration in high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1996; 23 (3): 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80011-5

33. Yuan J., Usman A., Das T. et al. Imaging Carotid Atherosclerosis Plaque Ulceration: Comparison of Advanced Imaging Modalities and Recent Developments. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2017; 38 (4): 664–671. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5026

34. Rafailidis V., Sidhu P.S. Vascular ultrasound, the potential of integration of multiparametric ultrasound into routine clinical practice. Ultrasound. 2018; 26 (3): 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X18762250

35. Simonetto M., Dharmadhikari S., Bennett A. et al. Do Carotid Plaque Ulcers Heal? Potential Detection of Carotid Artery Plaque Healing by Carotid Ultrasound Imaging. J. Ultrasound Med. 2021; 40 (5): 973–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15472

36. Schminke U., Motsch L., Hilker L., Kessler C. Three-dimensional ultrasound observation of carotid artery plaque ulceration. Stroke. 2000; 31 (7): 1651–1655. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.7.1651